In late 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finalized its open banking rule as required by Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The rule requires financial institutions and other data providers to make covered data regarding financial products and services available to consumers and authorized third parties in electronic form. Almost immediately, the CFPB was sued in federal district court in Kentucky, alleging several deficiencies with the rulemaking. On May 23 rd , the CFPB’s general counsel indicated that the agency plans to file a motion for summary judgment by May 30 th asking the court to cancel the rule. In a status report filed with the court, the CFPB stated, “after reviewing the rule and considering the issues that this case presents, Bureau leadership has determined that the rule is unlawful and should be set aside.” Notwithstanding this development, financial institutions must keep in mind that Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act statutorily mandates that the CFPB prescribe rules requiring covered persons to make certain information about financial products and services available to consumers in electronic form. Absent an act of Congress striking this requirement from the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB will need to start anew with its open banking initiative.
On May 15, 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published notice in the Federal Register that it is withdrawing three proposals introduced under the previous administration. First, the CFPB is withdrawing a proposed interpretive rule regarding applicability of the Electronic Fund Transfers Act to emerging payment mechanisms. Under the January 2025 proposal, a stablecoin, bitcoin, or other cryptocurrency transaction conducted in connection with a consumer asset account would be considered an electronic fund transfer subject to Regulation E’s requirements. Next, the CFPB is withdrawing a proposed rule that would have banned unfair provisions in credit contracts and specifically prohibited certain terms and conditions. Under the January 2025 proposal, a credit contract could not contain provisions such as a confession of judgment or waiver of exemption. In addition, a covered financial institution would not be able to enforce any term or condition that permits it to unilaterally amend a contract or restrain expression. Finally, the CFPB is withdrawing its proposed rule concerning harmful data broker practices. The proposal, issued in December 2024, would have treated data brokers as consumer reporting agencies, required a permissible purpose to obtain credit header data (e.g., name, address, date of birth, and social security number of a consumer) from a consumer reporting agency, and emphasized that marketing is not a permissible purpose to obtain a credit report under the FCRA. On May 9, 2025, the White House announced that President Trump is nominating Jonathan McKernan as Undersecretary of Treasury for Domestic Policy. It was later confirmed that as a result, Mr. McKernan’s previous nomination to head the CFBP is being withdrawn. Russell Vought, the Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, is currently serving as acting director of the Bureau. He may continue to do so for an additional 210 days under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. The White House has yet to announce a new nominee for CFPB director.
On May 12th, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published notice in the Federal Register that it is withdrawing dozens of interpretive rules, policy statements, and advisory opinions, dating as far back as 2011. The Bureau is withdrawing its guidance in light of the President’s directive to deregulate and streamline bureaucracy. In the future, the agency intends to only issue guidance when absolutely necessary, and only to reduce compliance burden. While the amount of guidance being withdrawn by the Bureau is too voluminous to fully detail here, below is a flavor of the agency's previous interpretations that no longer carry any precedential value: Policy Statements (8 withdrawn in total) Statement of Policy Regarding Prohibition on Abusive Acts or Practices – issued in April 2023, this statement provided an analytical framework of what constitutes an abusive act and/or practice Interpretive Rules (7 withdrawn in total) ECOA (Regulation B); Discrimination on the Bases of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity – issued in March 2021, this interpretive rule expanded Regulation B’s prohibition against sex discrimination to include both sexual orientation and gender identity Advisory Opinions (13 withdrawn in total) Circulars (16 withdrawn in total) Reopening Deposit Accounts that Consumers Previously Closed – issued in May 20243, this circular indicated that it is likely an unfair act and/or practice to unilaterally reopen a deposit account that was previously closed by the consumer Bulletins (23 withdrawn in total) Prohibition of Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices in the Collection of Consumer Debts – issued in July 2013, this bulletin outlined several debt collection practices that the agency would consider to be unfair, deceptive, and/or abusive
This website has been built to be accessible for all users. If you experience any difficulty in accessing this website, please contact us for assistance.